Wednesday, 12 November 2014

Fury: Review


Fury is a film of mud. Muddy roads, muddy fields, muddy people. The filth created by the mechanised destruction of WW2 is clinging and pervasive, both physically and morally. The film’s characters are caked in the dirt and horror they’ve been through as we join them as their campaign draws to a close. However, while the crew of the titular tank clearly teeter on the edge of mental stability, it is the metal walls surrounding them that, quite contrary to being a claustrophobic symbol of their misery, in fact hold together their collective and individual psyches. The walls are adorned with photos, medals and memorabilia, and we are given the sense that the men in fact need this enclosure and inherent, almost enforced, companionship, encapsulated in their repeated assertion that it is in fact ‘the best job (they) ever had’.

We join director David Ayer’s film in April 1945. Germany is in the midst of capitulation as WW2 draws to a close, yet the fighting continues. The crew of ‘Fury’, led by Brad Pitt’s (Moneyball, Inglorious Bastards) Don ‘Wardaddy’ Collier, Shia LaBeouf (Transformers, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull), Michael Peña (End of Watch, American Hustle) and Jon Bernthal (The Ghost, Wolf of Wall Street) are joined by Logan Lerman’s (Percy Jackson & the Lightening Thief, The Perks of Being a Wallflower) fresh faced addition to the group. Trained as a typing clerk yet thrown into the midst of battle with a matter of weeks’ training, Lerman’s Norman Ellison is our insight into the crew as he must quickly learn how to fit in and perform to the standard expected of him by men who know that, in a five man tank, there can be no weak links. 

Ayer continues, as in 2012’s impressive End of Watch, to provide an unflinching look at his chosen subject matter, fully displaying the gore of battle for the film’s entire duration. It is however, in the film’s design that it shines most. The costumes, locations and most importantly, the vehicles, are entirely convincing, with the production in fact making use of genuine working WW2-era tanks. All of this lends a necessary realism to the film as a whole, in particular the action set pieces, which at times are presented as all out slogs of persistent explosions, while at others feeling more like orchestrated acts of precision. This variety is welcome, but what is maintained is the atmosphere of desperation among the tank crews, not only to succeed, but to survive. 

What good work the film does in establishing its gritty realism, is unfortunately somewhat inhibited by the script and plot. From Pitt’s battle hardened commander, Lebeouf’s religious minded ‘Bible’, Bernthal’s unhinged and violent Grady through to Peña’s driver ‘Gordo’, Fury’s characters rarely stray far from stereotype. While the performances in these roles are good, with Pitt and Lerman given the most room to show their talents, Fury does often drift into the realms of predictability in terms of plot beats and character development. The finale in particular, is excessively overblown and takes the film’s tagline ‘War never ends quietly’ far too literally. It is in the moments where Fury dares to deviate from the expected norm that it feels more its own film but these moments are regrettably infrequent.

However, while there is at times a desire to see Fury do something different, what cannot be argued is that what the film does, it predominantly does incredibly well. While the plot is somewhat formulaic, the set pieces, production design and performances elevate the film, allowing it to provide an engaging display of the effects of war on both individuals and the collective. Ayer skilfully handles the film’s quieter moments, safe in the knowledge that they convey their desired message without having to spell them out through scenery chewing diatribes of exposition. An intense and gripping watch, not for the faint-hearted, Fury is not to be missed as we rumble into awards season.

4/5




Saturday, 11 January 2014

The Adjustment Bureau: Review



Upon recently deciding to dig out a copy of The Adjustment Bureau, the first time I’d seen it since its theatrical release, I was struck by the statutory quote from a critic on the box cover, stating “Bourne meets Inception’. This comparison struck me as somewhat erroneous, besides the fact that Matt Damon (of Bourne fame) stars in the film and there are certain Inception-lite psychological elements to the premise, they have little in common. The Adjustment Bureau lacks the same kind of frenetic kineticism and mystery as Damon’s Bourne trilogy, not to mention, Inception’s intellectualism. If anything, the film bears closer resemblance to the Wachowski's The Matrix, with the idea of seeing behind a curtain we weren’t even supposed to know was there, exposing a controlling background force. Regardless, this is not to say that The Adjustment Bureau is not an enjoyable watch. 

Based on the book of the same name by iconic sci-fi writer Philip K. Dick, Damon stars as David Norris, an ambitious politician with dreams of reaching the Senate and beyond, but with controversy never far behind him. In the aftermath of one such incident, circumstances align for him to meet Emily Blunt’s (Looper) contemporary ballet dancer Elise. The two seem made for each other, but it is soon made clear to David that they cannot be together, all because of the men from the titular Adjustment Bureau. As we are told, they are ‘the people who make sure things happen according to plan’, ensuring we do not stray from our predetermined fates. However, such is the effect Elise has had on David, he resolves to struggle against the trilby-sporting businessmen of fate to be with her. 

The performances here are not revelatory but enjoyable nonetheless. The interplay between Blunt and Damon, essential if we are to believe in the stakes he would fight against for her, works well. Their banter back and forth as well as the more genuine displays of affection are entirely convincing with the film itself falling more into the category of a romantic drama than straight up science fiction. Support is given by the likes of Anthony Mackie (The Hurt Locker) and Terrence Stamp (Wanted), with the former faring better than the latter. Mackie is engaging and watchable, yet Stamp feels as though he is merely picking up the paycheque with his facial expressions rarely straying far from ‘distinctly disgruntled’. 

The film moves along at a reasonable pace, with the closest to an action sequence being Damon running about a bit, without ever really setting the world alight. Somewhat peculiarly the film’s initial political backdrop seems to rather hastily become little more than an afterthought, in spite of the importance afforded to it in the progression of events. The Ides of March this most certainly is not. However, this does allow for the romance at the centre of the film to take centre stage and with good performances and likable characters, popcorn movies have certainly delivered worse in the past. 

Overall, The Adjustment Bureau is an absent minded pleasure (albeit a somewhat forgettable one), particularly for those prone to such wistful diversions in wondering what our own pre-determined plan might hold.

3/5

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Others with your browsing history also read...

In the meantime while I try and produce something worth reading, why not have a look at the handful of pieces I worked on for Redbrick Film in my time with them? Just follow the link below to my profile...

http://www.redbrick.me/author/thomaswilliams/

A disturbance in the force...

It has been some time since this blog saw the light of day, like the Ark of the Covenant in Raiders of the Lost Ark, it was stored and hidden from humanity in a metaphoric wooden crate. However, it has returned (with any luck to a better standard than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, but time will tell) to spout more of my nonsense. While the films featured may not always be new, or any good, hopefully you'll enjoy the read and maybe even find something you've never heard of that you might just fall in love with.


Wish me luck.